Tuesday 30 June 2015

Blue milk according to Chabert and Fromage (1805)




Early in the nineteenth century blue milk was an important problem, even more than mastitis. Most authors of veterinary publications, especially in Germany, treated mastitis and blue milk in one and the same chapter of diseases of milk, but only blue milk was mentioned as affecting the economy of the dairy farm, or any other farm at which milk was a commercial product for consumption, butter and, sometimes, cheese.
I have written about blue milk before (blog of september 18, 2013), but since I found that the problem of blue milk has been intimately connected to the development of the chemistry of milk and the microscopical detection of what we now call microorganisms in milk, the problem of blue milk merits a more detailed historical analysis.

One of the first publications discussing blue milk is a French booklet, dating rom 1805 (Germinal an XIII) and is written by P.Chabert and C.M.Fromage, both members of the Imperial Veterinary School of Alfort of which Chabert was the director and Fromage a teacher. The title of the booklet is “D’une altération du lait de vache, désignée sous le nom de lait bleu” or “The alteration of cow’s milk, designated as blue milk”.
Its introduction contains an interesting statement: “most of the alterations [i.e. changes in colour, consistency and other properties that make milk agreeable] have not sufficiently been the object of observations of the Chemistry and the Hygiene”. And although the authors gave much attention to the chemical background and characteristics of blue milk (to be discussed next time), hygiene is left out of their text, at least the hygiene that we in  the 2015 recognize as such; I suggest that chemistry and hygiene in 1805, as scientific disciplines, may belong to one and the same activity.
What follows is an essay of about 30 pages, dealing with blue milk only.
According to Chabert and Fromage the characteristics of blue milk are the following. Freshly drawn milk is normal, the cow looks healthy and the quantity of milk is not diminished; nevertheless, after 12-18 hours the milk starts to become blue, the surface of the milk and cream is covered with small small blue dots, the size of a lentil, which expand  to form a closed layer on top of the milk in a pail or vessel. Butter and cheese are affected in quality too, but the blue stain is mostly limited to the whey. The phenomenon does not occur in the milk of all cows but sometimes in one out of ten only; when the affected cow is kept separately, in another field, and its milk not mixed with the normal milk, the problem seems to disappear, but when the cow is brought back to the other cows it may appear again. As a passing remark, Chambert and Fromage tell us that some people think that blue milk is contagious, which may be based on the re-appearance of the problem after bringing formerly affected cows back into the herd. Other people say that the occurrence of blue milk may be reduced when you clean milk vessels with common salt. Both remarks seem important to us, because of what was later found about the cause and treatment of blue milk.
The authors think that the problem of blue milk was seen for the first time in 1787 at an abby near Evreux and elder people think that it is a very old problem. It is certain, say the authors,  that it has been increasing rapidly during the last 12-15 years (which is, for Chambert and Fromage, since 1790). Some farmers think that magic may be involved, or poisoning by enemies.
Dairy farms close to a larger town may succeed in selling their milk when it is still fresh and unchanged. Otherwise it should be given to pigs or dogs (who may not like it).
Chabert and Fromage discuss five possible causes. 1. The lay-out of stables and milk rooms. 2. The cleanliness of the milk rooms and the farmer’s houskeeping. 3. The nature of the soil and the cultivation of the vegetation. 4. The forage. 5. Wheather and climate. With regard to forage, they mention several plants that may contain indigo-like compounds that may bne transferred to the milk unchanged after ingestion.
Their main conclusion is that the blue milk comes and goes without any regularity and that it should be seen as a real disease because there is a change in the product of the phenomena of life. The underlying cause may be a change in physiology, which itself may be due to weakness of several organs, in combination with what we now may call stress by sudden heat or cold. This may lead to an altered action of the lymph, the blood vessels, the lungs and the milk glands.

(to be continued)


Sunday 7 June 2015

The Langreuter project: the reconstruction of the rise and fall of a milking machine




In the collection of big and small objects that are present in the basement of the Utrecht University Museum is a milking machine. It had been standing there for years, collecting dust only and doing nothing, a dead object.
On my proposal to try to revive the machine again the response was more than favourable: Babke Aarts, assistant-curator of the veterinary collection of the museum, and deciede to start a project immediately,  with the aim of finding out whether the milking machine could be brought to life and of reconstructing its history.
Hardly any data were available in the archives of the museum with regard to this machine. It had a number painted on it, corresponding to a card, telling us that it was obtained some 60 years ago. This was in agreement with a publication in the Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde (Journal of Veterinary Medicine) of 1963, in which Jan Grommers, than having the function of wetenschappelijk ambtenaar 1e  klasse (to be compared to an assistant professor nowadays) at the Institute voor Zoötechniek (Animal Husbandry) of the Veterinary Faculty of Utrecht University. The publication dealt with the role of the milking machine in the etiology of mastitis. Grommers wrote:

“Although in the development of the milking machine it has been attempted to imitate the milking by hand (a machine of this type has been handed over to the veterinary department of the university museum) all milking machines that are now in use operate by suction power”. (p. 1553)1

This was all the knowledge we had when we started: the milking machine had been a property of the Zootechnical Institute and it worked by imitating the hand of the milk-maid or milkman; in addition it had lost the competition for the market.

However, the machine delivered some information too. It had an identity label attached to it with the following text:

Melkmaschine “Langreuter”
(Patent Jens Nielsen)
Fabrikat der Maihak A.G.
HAMBURG

The name Langreuter is apparently the type of the machine and we took this name for the name of our project.

The machine has two parts, which we call the driver and the milking unit.The driver is shown in figure 1.

Fig. 1
   It contains two camshafts (which I hope is a proper translation of what it is called in Dutch) connected to two drawing cables that transfer the operation of the driver to the milking unit. The driver is operated by hand but the handle is missing.



Fig. 2

The milking unit is given in figure 2. It is shown upside down: the milk flows out of the tube’ that is now on top, into the milk-pail.


The progress of the project will be presented in a series of blog messages, in Dutch; for those who understand Dutch, see Langreuterproject.wordpress.com. We will try to translate and/or summarize our findings and I will post them on this blogsite. So keep following PHOAS.

In studying the the Langreuter milking machine and trying to bring it to work again, we hope to obtain more insight in the history of milking machines in general and why the Langreuter, together with other machines of the same type, lost the competition.

1. 1. F.J.Grommers. Een overzicht van de betekenis van het machinaal melken in de aetiologie van mastitis. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde, 88, 1553-1558, 1963